Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:06

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Deion Sanders gives update on health issues that have kept him home - New York Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Webb Captures a Cosmic Forest of Ancient Galaxies - PetaPixel
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Gut Microbiota Transplants May Cause Long-Term Imbalance - Neuroscience News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Imanaga Rehab, Boyd Shoulder, Reliever Swaps, and Other Cubs Bullets - Bleacher Nation
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
According to Scientists, This Is the Most Important Thing To Restore Your Gut Health - SciTechDaily